Wal-Mart is the proverbial 800-pound gorilla of retail stores, except that they're more like an 800-ton gorilla. Manufacturers base their production around creating cheap products to be sold through Wal-Mart. In a perverse rearrangement of the typical economic model, Wal-Mart has enough market share to go to its suppliers and demand cost cuts and/or efficiency, often through foreign outsourcing. If the suppliers refuse, Wal-Mart will play hardball by taking their orders elsewhere, which can essentially single-handedly kill a business. Just ask the good folks at Rubbermaid.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6eade/6eaded557b0805dc59c83a52fbaf94fba40fda19" alt=""
But it seems that where Wal-Mart just can't win at all is in the political arena. From its early days, Wal-Mart has been under pressure with the left because of its abject hostility toward unions. Wal-Mart will shut down stores before being forced to accept unionization. Now, however, Wal-Mart is feeling pressure from the right, thanks to its downplaying of the word "Christmas" in favor of a more religiously neutral term and its membership in the national gay and lesbian chamber of commerce.
Frankly, I don't give a damn about Wal-Mart's politics. Maybe that makes me a heartless conservative or a heathen liberal. I still don't shop there, however. Even though their prices can't be beat, Wal-Mart makes for an absolutely miserable shopping experience. The aisles are too narrow, the shelves are disorganized, there are never enough cashiers, and the store is a magnet for the dregs of society. I will gladly pay a few pennies more for the bright lighting, wide aisles, and commitment to customer service that I find at Target.
Look, Wal-Mart must be doing something right. Maybe the constant media and political attention is a necessary cost of doing business for them. In my mind, though, it just goes to prove that being the biggest is always the best.
No comments:
Post a Comment